Crunch Time for Architecture

Columnist Aaron Betsky presents the case for crunchiness in the resurgence of older architecture used in new ways.

4 MIN READ
Shenzhen Biennale venue

Courtesy Shenzhen Biennale

Shenzhen Biennale venue

It’s crunch time. For me personally, as I work both to make sure that the Taliesin Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture continues to exist after this month, and that the Shenzhen Biennale I am co-curating, “Re-Living the City,” which opened on December 4, runs smoothly; for the planet as a whole, where climate change, the depletion of un-renewable natural resources, and social unrest at a vast scale are threatening our continued existence—issues we try to address through architecture both at Taliesin and in Shenzhen—and for many other issues in-between. Perhaps what we need, I have been thinking, is architecture for crunch time, or a crunchy architecture.

Crunchy architecture is architecture that exhibits and frames reality, that is gritty, open, and has some meat to it. It does away with the opposition between new and old, as it delights in renovation, addition, and hybrids in time and form. It is the opposite of the kind of slick, bland, and anonymous forms in which most of us are imprisoned every day. Crunch architecture feels and is real. It is material to the max, messy and sometimes even aggressive—not because it wants to hurt us, but because we have become so used to reality disappearing behind images that tell us what to buy, where to go, and how to think that we forget what it means to be real. Crunchy architecture has gaps and falls apart. You can feel crunchy architecture in your bones.

Nostalgia is a big part of crunchy architecture. Walking around the venue for the Shenzhen Biennale—a former flour mill that is largely condemned to oblivion by a super-slick OMA plan of grids and boxes—the reality of the concrete, the smells, and the dust are all around you. There is a reason that such spaces have become popular sites for renovation, and why the most successful new public space in the United States, the High Line, is essentially a mechanism for viewing such crunchy architecture, even though it is now becoming hemmed in by smooth and expensive boxes: Reality is made real by use and disuse, by making and re-making, by living and re-living.

Crunchy architecture can be both old and new, as it starts from a love of, extension of, and framing of what we have already made. There is also a history of crunchy architecture, one that reaches back at least to the New Brutalism that is receiving renewed interest as of late, but goes all the way to the love of ruins and other romantic tropes from the time when the Enlightenment started to slick things up. It is a history of forms that show off their material, that look unfinished, that loom and lumber, cantilever and crumble, lunge, and are full of holes.


Is it possible to make new crunchy architecture? It is difficult, as so many of the qualities that make it real come from use and disuse. Yet, as we see a renewed interest in handicraft meeting the possibilities opened up by computer technologies, and as we realize the potential in passive planning and the active extension of existing structures, we realize that you can make things crunchy still today. To do so, you have to make an architecture that has the quality of ruin and construction, of the past and the future, built into it. Our Shenzhen Biennale will be filled with such architecture, and—building on Frank Lloyd Wright’s legacy not only of organic architecture, but also of forms such as “desert concrete” (stones from the site set in just enough concrete to bind them) and open, tent-like structures—we are trying to make it crunchy at Taliesin.

Hani Rashid of Asymptote Architecture shows designs for the New Hermitage Modern Contemporary Museum.

Courtesy New Hermitage Modern Contemporary Museum

Hani Rashid of Asymptote Architecture shows designs for the New Hermitage Modern Contemporary Museum.

I have noticed that even the makers of slickest and most fashionable skins seem to be getting crunchy: Look at Asymptote Architecture’s recent designs, such as the firm’s art museum for Moscow. Andrew Bromberg, Assoc. AIA, of AEDAS (an architect I visited in Hong Kong), recently showed me new work that eschews the fluid forms which he used in the past for open, crunchy forms. You can feel the crunch in your mouth when you see this work.

Crunchy architecture is neither new nor old, neither finished nor unfinished. It is disturbing, satisfying and very real mess that structures and gives shape to our modern lives in a way that will help us get ready for crunch time. It’s time to get crunchy.

About the Author

Aaron Betsky

Aaron Betsky is a critic and teacher living in Philadelphia. Previously, he was Professor and Director of the School of Architecture and Design at Virginia Tech and, prior to that, President of the School of Architecture at Taliesin. A critic of art, architecture, and design, Mr. Betsky is the author of over twenty books on those subjects. He writes a weekly blog, Beyond Buildings, for architectmagazine.com. Trained as an architect and in the humanities at Yale University, Mr. Betsky has served as the Director of the Cincinnati Art Museum (2006-2014) and the Netherlands Architecture Institute (2001-2006), as well as Curator of Architecture and Design at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (1995-2001). In 2008, he also directed the 11th Venice International Biennale of Architecture. His latest books are The Monster Leviathan (2024), Don’t Build, Rebuild: The Case for Imaginative Reuse (2024), Fifty Lessons from Frank Lloyd Wright (2021), Making It Modern (2019) and Architecture Matters (2019).

No recommended contents to display.

Upcoming Events

  • Future Place

    Irving, TX

    Register Now
  • Archtober Festival: Shared Spaces

    New York City, NY

    Register Now
  • Snag early-bird pricing to Multifamily Executive Conference

    Newport Beach, CA

    Register Now
All Events